The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Project Rationale

Across many Muslim-majority societies, questions of law, religion, constitutional change, and governance remain central to public life. These questions are especially important in societies shaped by imperial and post-imperial histories, where legal institutions, state authority, religious traditions, and public trust have developed through complex and often contested trajectories.

MINARET starts from the observation that debates on democratization, rule of law, and good governance have often been framed through Western-centric models. Such approaches do not always capture the ways in which legitimacy, citizenship, legal authority, and public institutions are understood in societies where Islamic values, local traditions, and imperial legacies continue to play an important role.

The project addresses this gap by studying post-imperial Islamic legal cultures as dynamic social and legal formations. It examines how constitutional systems take root in Muslim-majority societies, how citizens relate to legal and governmental authority, and how religious values may influence trust, stability, legal reform, and democratic development.

A key rationale for MINARET is that the relationship between Islam and constitutional governance cannot be reduced to simple oppositions between religion and secularism. In some contexts, secular arrangements have supported democratization; in others, more flexible accommodation of religious values has contributed to legitimacy and public trust. MINARET therefore studies these processes comparatively and empirically, avoiding one-size-fits-all assumptions.

The project focuses on Central Asia, the Middle East, North Africa, and Southeast Asia because these regions offer important but often underexplored perspectives on constitutional change, legal reform, and governance. Their histories include different imperial legacies, including Russian/Soviet, Ottoman, European, and other forms of imperial rule, making them especially valuable for comparative analysis.

MINARET also responds to a gap in existing research and doctoral training. Previous research has often examined democratization, rule of law, informality, Islamic law, or governance separately. MINARET brings these fields together within one interdisciplinary framework, combining comparative constitutionalism, sociology of law, Islamic studies, governance studies, legal anthropology, political science, and area studies.

By developing the framework of post-imperial Islamic legal cultures, the project seeks to generate new knowledge about how law, religion, and governance interact in contemporary Muslim-majority societies. This knowledge is intended not only to advance academic debates, but also to provide policy-relevant insights for institutions, decision-makers, civil society actors, and researchers working on democratization, constitutional reform, rule of law, and good governance.

In this sense, MINARET is grounded in both a scholarly and practical rationale: to understand legal and political change beyond inherited Western models, and to explore how more context-sensitive approaches to law, religion, and governance can contribute to legitimacy, stability, and democratic transformation.